Press Release Distribution
 

Members Login  |  Register  |  Why Join?   Subscribe to Newsletter Newsletter   RSS Feeds RSS Feeds

Video Releases    |    Pricing & Distribution Plans    |    Today's News    |    News By Category    |    News By Date    |    Business Directory
All Press Releases for February 18, 2012 »
RSS Feeds RSS Feed     Print this news Printer Friendly     Email this news Email It    Create PDF PDF Version    Bookmark del.icio.us    Diggs



Nothing Wrong With Off-Label Medical Device Use, Unless...
U.S. Senators are questioning Medtronic about whether or not it promoted off-label use of its Infuse bone graft medical device, and whether or not its paid researchers downplayed the side effects. 
x-small text small text medium text large text


    February 18, 2012 /24-7PressRelease/ -- As Janet Moore reports for the Star Tribune of Minnesota, there's nothing wrong--well, it's not illegal, anyway--to use a medical device in surgical procedures that haven't been approved by the FDA.

Such use is known as "off-label."

It's not illegal to use, but it is illegal to promote such use, and that's exactly what Medtronic appears to have been doing throughout a period of years where its Infuse bone graft device raked in $700-900 million annually.

The Case of Laurie DeNeui

Nothing illustrates the off-label issue with Infuse more than Moore's report about 46-year-old (former) schoolteacher Laurie DeNeui.

DeNeui had surgery to treat neck pain after an apparent car accident, and her surgeon used the Infuse product. This was in 2005, before the FDA warned against using Infuse in neck procedures.

Nonetheless, Infuse had never been approved by the FDA for use in the neck. As a result of an aggressive off-label promotional campaign, roughly 85 percent of procedures involving Infuse were off-label.

One of those cases is Ms. DeNeui, and she is now permanently disabled.

The Case Against Medtronic

After a long and unlawful string of off label promotion, three U.S. Senators are demanding answers from like Medtronic.

Liz Jones Hollis reports for Fierce Medical Devices that the Senators want to know about the "financial relationships" between paid researchers who glossed over the side effects of Infuse--side effects that include incapacitating swelling in the throat that have caused permanent injury and even death in some patients--researchers paid by Medtronic.

They also want to know about Medtronic's "post-market surveillance," as Hollis reports, a term that refers to a medical device maker's methods of determining adverse outcomes after surgery.

But, with that billion-dollar market for treating backpain, and with Infuse used for off-label procedures in 85 percent of all cases (Laurie DeNeui's case just one of thousands) it seems likely that Medtronic is not entirely capable of conducting sufficient post-market surveillance.

Article provided by Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger
Visit us at www.infusebonelawsuit.com/


---
Press release service and press release distribution provided by http://www.24-7pressrelease.com


# # #

Read more Press Releases from FL Web Advantage:

Press Release Service & Press Release Distribution News Supplied By 24-7PressRelease.com
Social Media:
Share or bookmark this story using Facebook, Twitter, Digg, and more.

Bookmark and Share
Press Release Contact Information:
FL Web Advantage

E-Mail: Email us Here
Disclaimer:
If you have any questions regarding information in this press release, please contact the person listed in the contact module of this page. Please do not attempt to contact 24-7 Press Release. We are unable to assist you with any information regarding this release. 24-7 Press Release disclaims any content contained in this press release. Please see our complete Terms of Service disclaimer for more information.